On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 01:38:58PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote: > I don't think primary/secondary are exact substitutes for master/slave in > the way that those four terms are commonly used today. [...] > If we are looking for alternative terminology to master/slave (which I am > not against, because change is a constant and inclusiveness and awareness > amongst all industries is surely to be supported and encouraged) in my > opinion we should find new words and not redefine or overload the common > meaning of primary and secondary.
I share the desire for perfection, but IMHO the transition from "master" to "primary" and "slave" to "secondary" is far enough under way and well enough understood at this point that I suspect it would be easier to add modifiers when necessary than to try to deploy new vocabulary entirely. -- Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
