In article <[email protected]> you write: >Seems like .org needs to update an 18+ year old operation policy, and >just to clarify that has nothing to do with this draft as .org already >has this problem.
I believe that every public contracted TLD does the same sort of suspensions that .ORG does since they all have similar contracts. I wouldn't bs surprised if a lot of ccTLDs do too, since many have their policies similar to the gTLD ones. Having just come back from yet another fight over DMARC, I am extremely unsympathetic to arguments along the lines of "your reality doesn't match my clever hack, therefore your reality must change." In this case I can't imagine the TLDs changing since that would require changing both ICANN contracts and the complex and messy EPP system used to manage TLDs. I think the reasonable approach here is to stop further consideration of this draft until Paul can survey the existing TLD practice and see how many TLDs really are delegation-only. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
