Hey, On 3 Nov 2020, at 10:49, Joe Abley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Well, 200+ TLD's are now removing this problematic orphan glue due to >>> security reasons unrelated to this draft. > > I have not done a survey of other TLD zones, but perhaps if I have a few > spare minutes I'll take CZDS for a spin and see what I can see there. I don't have access to all zone data in CZDS since some registries take longer to approve access than others. It's perhaps also worth mentioning that CZDS doesn't carry any ccTLD zone data. This is not a representative sample. From a quick look (with very little checking, and more than a little crude scripty hackery) it looks to me like 217 TLDs have at least one orphan glue record and 872 have none, based on this incomplete sample. jabley@manta bin % jq '.zones | map_values(select(.orphans > 0)) | keys | length' zonedata.json 217 jabley@manta bin % jq '.zones | map_values(select(.orphans == 0)) | keys | length' zonedata.json 872 jabley@manta bin % See attached, if you feel like slicing the data some other way (or checking it). Joe
zonedata.json
Description: application/json
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
