Mark Andrews wrote:
It advises against a new QTYPE that returns multiples types and gives
the reasoning behind the decision. That is not the same as prohibiting
QDCOUNT > 1.
That's in my first mail.
But, we are in subthread on my second mail.
All of you should learn to read the rfcs and, then,
mails you are responding, before writing huge amount
of abstract nonsenses.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
