On Mon, 01 May 2023 21:15:29 +0000 Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote:
> Yes -- some people (not me) would evidently describe a server that > they didn't receive a response from as lame. Lots of people and organizations tend to talk about "types" or "ways" in which a server or delegation is lame. Here are a few well known organizations or popular pages talking about what lame means so you know the sorts of inconsistency (that's a term I like :-) you're up against: <https://kb.isc.org/docs/lame-servers-what-are-they-and-how-does-bind-deal-with-them> <https://blog.apnic.net/2021/03/16/the-prevalence-persistence-perils-of-lame-nameservers/> <https://cdocs.menandmice.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6360996> <https://dnsinstitute.com/research/lame-servers-201911/> <https://github.com/zonemaster/zonemaster/blob/master/docs/internal-documentation/functional-tests/Configuration-TP/configuration03.md> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System> John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
