On 7/18/2023 8:42 PM, George Michaelson wrote:
I know, I could submit these to the PSL website directly. I am asking
a meta question: do we think that operationally, if a PSL exists, that
all ccTLD and TLD should be on it?
The following ccTLD are in ISO3166 but not in the PSL:
bd
bl
bq
ck
eh
er
fk
jm
kh
mf
mm
np
pg
um
za
More than 1/2 of these are actually on the PSL, but weirdly formatted.
E.g., "*.pg" rather than "pg".
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
