According to Paul Wouters <[email protected]>: > >> On Jan 27, 2024, at 16:42, Paul Marks <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>  pick .lan >> instead? It seems that a lot of people are already using this abbreviation >> on their internal >networks, which happen to be local in >> area. > >LAN implies local area network. So an organization with multiple locations >would have a LAN at each >location, but the .LAN would be their collection of LANs? I think that would >lead to confusion.
It's also the name of a group of airlines in South America. I was surprised none of them applied for a vanity TLD. The name .INTERNAL is fine. Let's argue about something else. R's, John -- Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
