On Feb 27, 2024, at 10:53, Toerless Eckert <t...@cs.fau.de> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 01:48:22PM +0100, Joe Abley wrote: >> Op 27 feb 2024 om 12:08 heeft Toerless Eckert <t...@cs.fau.de> het volgende >> geschreven: >> >>> I would like to see a BCP RFC on the use of the "internal" TLD, >>> and ICANN should not finalize availability of the TLD unless that RFC >>> exists. >> >> Surely what ICANN is preparing to do is make a decision that an "internal" >> TLD should never be available. > > How did you come to that conclusion. It sounded to me as if ICANN > is on the road to assign .internal for the purpose.
No, not at all. The wording of the proposal says "string to be reserved for the purpose of a top-level domain that may be used for internal or private use applications". Here, "reserved" means never put in the root zone. I note that the term "reserved" was never defined. I'll try to get that rectified. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
