Dear all, Thanks for your patience as I was on vacations when the publication of this I-D was requested. As the DNSOP responsible AD is also an author, I was selected as the acting responsible AD for this I-D. Hence, here are some comments that I want to be addressed (either by replying to me or by a revised I-D) before proceeding to the IETF Last Call.
1. The shepherd write-up is very terse , so far so good, but does not include a justification for the intended status (PS is the correct one of course) 2. Should this document update (in the meta-data, abstract, and introduction) RFCs 4034 and 5155 ? (I think so) 3. The phrasing of the last paragraph section 2 is weird with a mix of MUST and MAY 4. Section 5 "Digest Algorithms" registry, there is a Status field but no "Use for DNSSEC Delegation" field 5. Section 5 s/DNS Security Algorithm Numbers registry/“DNS Security Algorithm Numbers” registry/ and there is no “MUST NOT” value, just “N” Once the above points are addressed, then I will proceed with the publication of this important document. Regards, -éric
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
