On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 10:01 AM, Eric Vyncke < [email protected]> wrote:
> Dear all, > > > > Thanks for your patience as I was on vacations when the publication of > this I-D was requested. > Thanks, an no worries… As the DNSOP responsible AD is also an author, I was selected as the acting > responsible AD for this I-D. Hence, here are some comments that I want to > be addressed (either by replying to me or by a revised I-D) before > proceeding to the IETF Last Call. > > > > 1. The shepherd write-up is very terse , so far so good, but does not > include a justification for the intended status (PS is the correct one of > course) > 2. Should this document update (in the meta-data, abstract, and > introduction) RFCs 4034 and 5155 ? (I think so) > > Thank you, done! > 3. The phrasing of the last paragraph section 2 is weird with a mix of > MUST and MAY > > Thank you, done! > 3. Section 5 "Digest Algorithms" registry, there is a Status field > but no "Use for DNSSEC Delegation" field > 4. Section 5 s/DNS Security Algorithm Numbers registry/“DNS Security > Algorithm Numbers” registry/ and there is no “MUST NOT” value, just “N” > > > Awesome, thank you, we are not addressing these, and your later mail noted that they are moot. Additionally, and for the record, yes, both Wes and I are OK being cited as authors… W Once the above points are addressed, then I will proceed with the > publication of this important document. > > > Regards, > > > > -éric > > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
