On 06/10/2026 22:46, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Yeah, dnsman feels definitely wrong to me. I’m looking at other active
wg and these names pop up:
dns - I actually like that idea, Ted, there’s a lot of groups named like
this
dnsbis (DNS, like httpbis is HTTP)
dnsm (DNS maintenance; sshm, tcpm)
dnsmaint (DNS maintenance; mailmaint)
dnsme (DNS maintenance and extensions; ipsecme)
dnscore (DNS core protocol; sipcore)
dnsp (DNS Protocol; but too close to dnsop)
dnsu (DNS update; emu)
dnswg (DNS Working Group; rtgwg)
Out of these - dns, dnswg and dnsme are my favorites.
Of these three, dnsme is my favourite.
dnswg would work if we have an DNS Area. ;-)
-- Benno
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
