On Tue, Oct 6, 2026 at 4:46 PM Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah, dnsman feels definitely wrong to me. I’m looking at other active wg > and these names pop up: > Ack on dnsman ... (dnsmaint would be more appropriate). > dns - I actually like that idea, Ted, there’s a lot of groups named like > this > dnsbis (DNS, like httpbis is HTTP) > dnsm (DNS maintenance; sshm, tcpm) > dnsmaint (DNS maintenance; mailmaint) > dnsme (DNS maintenance and extensions; ipsecme) > dnscore (DNS core protocol; sipcore) > dnsp (DNS Protocol; but too close to dnsop) > dnsu (DNS update; emu) > dnswg (DNS Working Group; rtgwg) > > Out of these - dns, dnswg and dnsme are my favorites. > Most of those sound reasonable. My favorites: dnscore, dnsmaint, or Roy's suggestion of dnsproto. I kind of like dnsbis too, but I fear it sounds too much like we might be embarking on the mythical DNS 2.0 project, rather than incremental improvements to the protocol :) Shumon.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
