> substantial comments
> --------------------
>
> 1) The memo has some language which seems to indicate that the author
> believes 6to4 using DHCP-learned IPv4 addresses may be inappropriate. I
> completely disagree with this, and I think more justification is needed, or
> this text should be removed. In:
>
> o IPv4 DHCP-based 6to4 sites could inherit nonsense reverse entries.
> It is not clear that using 6to4 services in such environments is
> entirely appropriate. In any case the client site could request
> delegation of the reverse zone as required.
>
> and:
>
> It is envisaged that scenarios that would motive this
> concern would include when the IPv4 provider is also offering an IPv6
> service, and native IPv6 should be deployed instead of 6to4, or when
> the service provider has dynamically allocated (via DHCP) IPv4 and
> wishes to block customers' ability to use this scheme on those
> addresses.
the issue here is NOT whether or not DHCP-assigned, but the stability
of IPv4 address. i'm not sure what is the best way to phrase it.
itojun
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
