On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote: > > > the issue here is NOT whether or not DHCP-assigned, but the stability > > > of IPv4 address. i'm not sure what is the best way to phrase it. > > > > Are there specific problems of stability of such an address? Could > > you elaborate? > > changing NS for x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.2.0.0.2.ip6.int. every hour is not > pretty.
With DNS Incremental Updates, a low TTL and a scripting path to the delegation engine you could support changing the NS in line with DHCP changes.
Is it reasonable to add this (DNS IND, low TTL) to the spec to support shorter term use of DHCP addresses for 6to4?
Geoff
. dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
