On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Geoff Huston wrote: > With DNS Incremental Updates, a low TTL and a scripting path to the > delegation engine you could support changing the NS in line with DHCP > changes. > > Is it reasonable to add this (DNS IND, low TTL) to the spec to > support shorter term use of DHCP addresses for 6to4?
I don't see why it couldn't be mentioned, but as discussed previously, I don't think this is necessarily a real problem. If the DHCP address changes e.g., hourly, it makes (IMHO) very little sense to even try to keep the reverses in sync. But as the operator of these systems doesn't see whether the user is DHCP or not, this seems a bit misleading.. and casting bad light on those DHCP operators which have proper, longer leases. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings . dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
