Mark Andrews wrote:
>>Mass CNAME synthesis can, and thus MUST, be performed purely
>>locally within a server as a minor zone file syntax change
>>without any protocol changes.
> Well when you have a server that can load 18446744073709551616
> CNAME records require to replace 1 DNAME record at the /64
> level please let me know.
A sane implementers simply load 1 instance of specific syntax
as a directive to synthesis 18446744073709551616 or more possible
CNAME records.
During the transition period to obsolete DNAME, implementers
are encouraged let DNS servers interprete "DNAME" as such a
directive.
Masataka Ohta
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
