On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Mark Andrews wrote: > The use of DNAME has always been *independent* of whether > A6/AAAA or nibble/Bitlabels are in use. The choice to use > DNAME is driven by neither of these. It will be driven by > the need to shift a heirachy of zones without having to > redelegate the entire heirachy.
I think the current text: In particular one should note that the use of A6 records in the forward tree or Bitlabels in the reverse tree is not recommended [2]. Using DNAME records is not recommended in the reverse tree in conjunction with A6 records; the document did not mean to take a stance on any other use of DNAME records [5]. is good, because it clarifies the intent. Removing it would be worse. Do you agree? -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings . dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
