On Friday 28 January � 11:29, Michael Foord wrote:
> epydoc isn't abandoned - but happydoc is.

good news :)

> I like epydoc, but would also prefer to see a version that parsed source 
> code rather than importing it. Would make it much harder to link classes 
> to super classes etc though I guess.

I've already that (and much other things) in my toolbox :)
I'm the pylint author and I've build a package which extends the compiler
package classes to ease source code analysis without relying on "living"
objects. Everything is in astng subpackage of logilab's common library
(http://www.logilab.org/projects/common). Starting from that I think the
task wouldn't be that hard...

-- 
Sylvain Th�nault                               LOGILAB, Paris (France).

http://www.logilab.com   http://www.logilab.fr  http://www.logilab.org

_______________________________________________
Doc-SIG maillist  -  [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/doc-sig

Reply via email to