On Fri, Jan 28, 2005, Sylvain Th?nault wrote: > On Friday 28 January ? 10:51, Aahz wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 28, 2005, Michael Foord wrote: >>> >>> epydoc isn't abandoned - but happydoc is. >>> >>> I like epydoc, but would also prefer to see a version that parsed >>> source code rather than importing it. Would make it much harder to >>> link classes to super classes etc though I guess. >> >> One of the primary goals for Python 2.5 is to finally push through the >> AST branch. If you want parsed source, consider joining python-dev and >> helping with that project. > > What do you mean ? Core python being based on a more usable ast than > the one returned by the parser module ?
That's my understanding, keeping in mind that I haven't paid much attention. > More than that ? Would be very interested if you could tell be more > about your point, or giving me some pointers... Sorry, you'll need to do some research or hope one of the other people reading knows more. -- Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing." --Alan Perlis _______________________________________________ Doc-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/doc-sig
