On Friday 28 January � 10:51, Aahz wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2005, Michael Foord wrote: > > > > epydoc isn't abandoned - but happydoc is. > > > > I like epydoc, but would also prefer to see a version that parsed > > source code rather than importing it. Would make it much harder to > > link classes to super classes etc though I guess. > > One of the primary goals for Python 2.5 is to finally push through the > AST branch. If you want parsed source, consider joining python-dev and > helping with that project.
What do you mean ? Core python being based on a more usable ast than the one returned by the parser module ? More than that ? Would be very interested if you could tell be more about your point, or giving me some pointers... TIA -- Sylvain Th�nault LOGILAB, Paris (France). http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org _______________________________________________ Doc-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/doc-sig
