Hi, Am Freitag, 11. September 2015, 23:45:25 schrieb Warren Block: > [...] > > For me, DocBook is powerful but a pain to write. AsciiDoc is simple to > write, but does not have the semantic markup power of DocBook.
That is the essential part. I hear from all sites that DocBook is a bit overwhelming for non-technical people. They would love to contribute but don't want to install and work with a complex toolchain just for fixing a simple typo. For this reason, AsciiDoc would be a good start. Unfortunately, I have to agree what Warren said about the lack of "semantic power". Funny sidenote, AsciiDoc was based on DocBook. ;) By the way, DocBook5 is based on a RELAX NG schema. It can be written in a compact version (RNC) or in a XML syntax (RNG). Both are interchangeable without loss of information. It would be great if AsciiDoc would fill this gap, so both XML experts and non-technical inclined people could be satisfied. -- Gruß/Regards Thomas Schraitle --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
