On 25/07/07, Dave Pawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Colin Shapiro wrote:
> On 7/24/07, Nic Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I can see what you're getting at. In the last DocBook project I worked
>> on we customised to allow <uri> in the <address> element. Would that
>> sort of thing work for you?
>
>
> Yes, <uri> is a more general name than the ones I suggested (<web> or
> <homepage>), but that isn't necessarily a bad thing, since my suggestions
> imply an HTTP URI, which may not always be the case.
>
> I think something like that would work. In my case, all I want to do is
> put
> my company's website URL into <address>.
Homepage is a more normal word for this?
I agree with the idea too.
An optional address element.
We used <uri> because it was important to us to track that fact that
is was the same sort of entity as the other uris in our documents. I
think that a more descriptive name is just as valid though.
nic
--
Nic Gibson
Director, Corbas Consulting Ltd
Editorial and Technical Consultancy
http://www.corbas.co.uk/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
