Quite possibly because it hasn't been moved from CCD to the SFWNV consolidation yet. (I am not sure if this is the answer, as I am not 100% up to date on what utils are where)
--brian On 7/11/07, michelle olson <michelle.olson at sun.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Cool, thanks for the reply. For mo-3 that is what I meant. But, now I > have a new question about why we don't have a man page for rsync :) > Makes sense about the output example. > > Thanks, > Michelle > > Brian Gupta wrote: > > On 7/11/07, *michelle olson* <michelle.olson at sun.com > > <mailto:michelle.olson at sun.com>> wrote: > > > > Hi Brian, > > > > Thanks for working on this, very cool! Yes, we can definitely link > to > > this from the docs list, where do you think it fits best? Here's my > > review feedback: > > > > mo-1 missing closing parentheses on third bullet in section 1 > > > > > > Fixed > > > > mo-2 Are the last three sections duplicates? > > > > > > Yes. Fixed. > > > > mo-3 Can you specify the manpage(s) in first sentence of Common > Flags > > section? > > > > > > Fixed, please verify that this is what you want. > > > > mo-4 could you give an example without variables that includes > output? > > (just nice-to-have) > > > > > > Umm this is a bit trickier. If you have it on verbose, it spits out > > one line per file/directory... Since the output is very > > straightforward, I would prefer to skip. If someone else wants to add > > a section for this feel free. (That's the beauty of a wiki) > > > > Thanks again! > > Michelle > > > > Brian Gupta wrote: > > > Thanks Eric, I agree with your suggestionis and have made the > > > necessary changes. (I will also include some info on the -H > > option as > > > Ceri suggested.) > > > > > > On 7/11/07, * Eric Armstrong* <Eric.Armstrong at sun.com > > <mailto:Eric.Armstrong at sun.com> > > > <mailto:Eric.Armstrong at sun.com <mailto:Eric.Armstrong at sun.com>>> > > wrote: > > > > > > Good writeup. One note: > > > > > > The admonition at the end to be sure to include the final > > slashes > > > should be right up at the top, at the end of the Basic Syntax > > > section--and the paragraph in that section should include the > > > terminal slash on the first item, as well as the second: > > > > > > The basic syntax is simple enough. Here's a generic example > > > that synchronizes the contents of a local directory > > > - dirpath/ - with a remote counterpart > > > ^^^ > > > - remotehost:/dirpath/ using rsh as the transport > protocol. > > > > > > Brian Gupta wrote: > > > > If people don't have any issues, do we want to link to it > from > > > the docs > > > > section? > > > > > > > > On 7/11/07, *Brian Gupta* < brian.gupta at gmail.com > > <mailto:brian.gupta at gmail.com> > > > <mailto:brian.gupta at gmail.com <mailto:brian.gupta at > > gmail.com>> > > > > <mailto:brian.gupta at gmail.com > > <mailto:brian.gupta at gmail.com> <mailto:brian.gupta at gmail.com > > <mailto:brian.gupta at gmail.com>>>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/Rsync_on_Solaris_HOWTO > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Brian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > docs-discuss mailing list > > > > docs-discuss at opensolaris.org > > <mailto:docs-discuss at opensolaris.org> > > <mailto:docs-discuss at opensolaris.org > > <mailto:docs-discuss at opensolaris.org>> > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > docs-discuss mailing list > > > docs-discuss at opensolaris.org <mailto:docs-discuss at > > opensolaris.org> > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/docs-discuss/attachments/20070712/408f5c4b/attachment.html>
