On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Rainer Heilke wrote:

> The only FOSS tool I can think of is Scribus, but it may not be advanced 
> enough for what you need. If not, InDesign (part of Adobe CS) is the only 
> commercial DTP tool worth considering. It's expensive, though. (And CS3 is 
> out.)
>
> Rainer

What I'm rather looking for is experiences on writing things directly in a 
markup language, aka troff, TeX, SGML, HTML/CSS - am I dreaming there and 
everyone these days has resorted to using GUI tools only ?

I've heard of Scribus; it's supposed to be a DTP software, but that's not 
strictly what I'm looking for. Layout is a minor part of my worries; Large 
sections of text and simple control over text formatting (style 
definitions) are more important, and so is the ability to store the 
document (parts) in a plaintext format.

Interesting feedback - thanks !
FrankH.



>
> Brandorr wrote:
>
>> What about Adobe CS2? It is widely used in the publishing industry. (Mac/PC 
>> though)
>> 
>> On 8/8/07, *Frank Hofmann* < Frank.Hofmann at sun.com 
>> <mailto:Frank.Hofmann at sun.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     I'm considering re-writing / updating the Crashdump Analysis book,
>>     but
>>     this time in a "proper" way - that is, specifically, not as a
>>     StarOffice
>>     document but in some sort of a markup language. The StarOffice
>>     thing is
>>     simply not maintainable :(
>>
>>     TeX comes to mind as I've used it before, but I'd like to know
>>     what other
>>     alternatives people use. My requirements apart from the typesetting
>>     capabilitities would be:
>>
>>     a) input is plain text, aka editable with any ASCII-capable editor
>>     b) ability to embed vector graphics (preferrable SVG) as
>>     illustrations
>>     c) ability to create PDF output
>>     d) automatic index/TOC generation
>>     e) documents can consist of multiple files (one per chapter), and be
>>         transferrable to another machine without the need to edit
>>     pathnames
>>
>>     What are others using ? Any recommendations ?
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     FrankH.
>> 
>
>

Reply via email to