On 8/31/07, Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at sun.com> wrote: > Brandorr wrote: > > A decision has been made to replace /bin/sh with a more > > modern/user-friendly default system shell. Ksh93 was chosen because it > > is fully backwards compatible with /bin/sh, is fully standards > > compliant, has all of the features you love about bash, and also > > happens to be the most powerful scripting shell available. > > It's been discussed, but I don't think anyone can say it's decided yet > that's what will happen.
Who is going to make the decision? -- robert neville - it consultant
