> If the change is intending to integrate to the opensolaris gates, it > needs ARC review if review is appropriate.
Absolutely. And it's my full expectation that any changes[1] that Indiana proposes will be so reviewed before going into the official OpenSolaris gates. > If a distribution were to choose to keep all its changes private to > them, they wouldn't *have* to get them reviewed. It would just (I > think) be particularly bad practice to work that way in most cases. That's certainly true if Indiana was going to do that but I don't believe that's the model we should be persuing. And I agree that it would be a bad practice to work that way in most cases. dsc [1] Ok, with the exception perhaps of things involving Sun branding. :-)
