On 8/31/07, Robert Neville <rbtneville at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/31/07, Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at sun.com> wrote:
> > Brandorr wrote:
> > > A decision has been made to replace /bin/sh with a more
> > > modern/user-friendly default system shell. Ksh93 was chosen because it
> > > is fully backwards compatible with /bin/sh, is fully standards
> > > compliant, has all of the features you love about bash, and also
> > > happens to be the most powerful scripting shell available.
> >
> > It's been discussed, but I don't think anyone can say it's decided yet
> > that's what will happen.
>
> Who is going to make the decision?
The distribution authors have this authority, like Marc Hamilton and
Ian Murdock for Indiana, Moinak Ghosh for Belenix, Martin Bochnig for
Matux, ARC review committee for Solaris and so forth
Cheers,
William
--
@,,@ William James
(\--/) williamjamesgnusolaris at gmail.com
(.>__<.) GNU/Solaris hacker
