Well, I don't know what lists Daniel is paying attention to.  So let's
forward this on to him, and remind him and everyone else that the new
format is described at:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/docsformat.html
and there is an example of it here:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_setenvif.xml

Joshua.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 07:53:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org
To: Apache Documentation Project <docs@httpd.apache.org>
Subject: XML docs and Comanche

Something just occurred to me, re XML docs and Comanche. Daniel told me,
a long long time ago, that if the Apache module docs were in XML,
getting Comanche bindings to configure these modules and directives
would be trivial. We need to make sure that Daniel, and whoever else is
working on Comanche these days, knows about the XML stuff that we are
doing, so that Comanche is aware of what tags mean what. Joshua, do you
know if they are aware of this yet?

-- 
Nothing is perfekt. Certainly not me.
Success to failure. Just a matter of degrees.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to