Hi, I follow docs@, and I like the idea of converting the docs to xml, for at least two reasons:
a) This will help GUI tools in presenting online help. b) About what Rich is mentioning, what I was thinking is making the directive definition structured, so it can be parsed programmatically. I have in Comanche something along the lines of: <directive type="number"> <name>Port</name> <default>80</name> <range><min>0</min><max>65536</max></range> </directive> Cheers Daniel > Well, I don't know what lists Daniel is paying attention to. So let's > forward this on to him, and remind him and everyone else that the new > format is described at: > http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/docsformat.html > and there is an example of it here: > http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_setenvif.xml > > Joshua. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 07:53:51 -0500 (EST) > From: Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org > To: Apache Documentation Project <docs@httpd.apache.org> > Subject: XML docs and Comanche > > Something just occurred to me, re XML docs and Comanche. Daniel told me, > a long long time ago, that if the Apache module docs were in XML, > getting Comanche bindings to configure these modules and directives > would be trivial. We need to make sure that Daniel, and whoever else is > working on Comanche these days, knows about the XML stuff that we are > doing, so that Comanche is aware of what tags mean what. Joshua, do you > know if they are aware of this yet? > > -- > Nothing is perfekt. Certainly not me. > Success to failure. Just a matter of degrees. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
