On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Daniel Lopez wrote: > b) About what Rich is mentioning, what I was thinking is making the directive > definition structured, so it can be parsed programmatically. I have in > Comanche something along the lines of: > > <directive type="number"> > <name>Port</name> > <default>80</name> > <range><min>0</min><max>65536</max></range> > </directive> >
I hadn't really considered this second part. It goes somewhat beyond the question of documentation as such, and could be quite complicated to implement. I notice you chose a simple example ;-) Could you show what you do for some of the more complex directives? (variable number of arguments, etc) Basically, you are talking about a much more structured format for the <syntax> tag that we currently have. This would certainly be useful under some circumstances. Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
