Andr� Malo wrote:
* Joshua Slive wrote:


You're right.  The docs are not at all clear on that point and should
be improved.


Perhaps we can modify the syntax definition as below:


I'm really trying to avoid any kind of complex formatting in the directive definitions (except in <usage>, of course), because that will make it easier to reuse this information in other formats.


Instead, I've just added a sentence to the <usage> info. It's still not incredibly clear, but it is more accurate.

Thanks for the heads-up on this.

Joshua.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to