-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Joshua Slive wrote:
>  That is FAR more important than
> the fact that having /docs/something map to 1.3 is not "pretty" from a
> visual perspective.

No, it has nothing whatever to do with looking pretty. It has to do with
getting the documentation for the recommended version of the product
when you request the documentation.

But, you're right, we've hashed it through repeatedly, and I lack the
energy to do it again. It seems unintuitive to me that /docs will
forever map to a version of the product that we encourage people not to
use. Perhaps some day we can decide that a vanishingly small portion of
the population uses 1.3, and we can change it then.

Sorry for bringing it up. It had been a year since the last time, and it
seemed like an opportune moment.

- --
Rich Bowen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEoUZwXP03+sx4yJMRApMhAKDNBxjV+txjmwjQrj4/xDv9awRnlACg59r7
KLGuE9twv5yxVSOIc0/WEV4=
=tSg6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to