Joshua Slive wrote:
On 6/27/06, Noirin Plunkett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:48:56AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> Any other solution would result in MANY broken links (due to changes
> in doc structure, not to mention the fact that some people still
> really do want to link to the 1.3 docs).
Other people's broken links aren't really our problem.
Ahhhhh (hear me screaming), of course they are ;-)
http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI
One of the most important characteristic of URIs are that they refer
to a specific resource permanently. That is FAR more important than
the fact that having /docs/something map to 1.3 is not "pretty" from a
visual perspective.
Yet who cares? If the formerly docs/mod/mod_alias.html becomes the 2.2
version of the same document, there should be no issue.
Unfortunately, docs/mod/mod_access.html goes *poof*.
So if the old pattern URL's always go to the now-current release branch,
do we want to start creating some redirects from old-module-name into our
new-module-name?
Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
