I'm not sure how useful that aggregate would be. By rici's argument, the user would still need to search for his issue on that page to get to the right link anyway. If we want to make things easy to get to for the user then really, an aggregate page is quite useless, imo. Plus, the maintaining of that aggregate page seems like wasted time to me.
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Vincent Bray wrote: > On 05/07/07, megaspaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Basically the question is this. We are going to move the issues in the > > CommonMisconfigurations wiki page to their own pages, but should we keep the > > CommonMisconfigurations page or delete it completely? Rici is of the mind of > > keeping it as an index of links to the new wiki pages of those issues. What > > would be the consensus of the rest of you? > > Can't we have both? Isn't there a way to create a page as an aggregate > of several others, like how wikipedia reuses article parts between > articles? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
