Fair enough. But, the way it is now, it's not really an index page. There's no guarantee that a person adding an entry to the log section will update this aggregate as well and vice versa. It seems like it's something that would get out of sync rather quickly. Although, there really isn't much in the common misconfigs page as of right now, so it doesn't seem like a big issue at the moment. But it is something I can see becoming extremely unmanageable if new content gets added to the log section or to this common misconfigs page. The more I think about it, the more I really want to have one section. And doesn't http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/Logs already seem like an index page already?
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Joshua Slive wrote: > On 7/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm not sure how useful that aggregate would be. By rici's argument, the > > user would still need to search for his issue on that page to get to the > > right link anyway. If we want to make things easy to get to for the user > > then really, an aggregate page is quite useless, imo. Plus, the > > maintaining of that aggregate page seems like wasted time to me. > > And how are people supposed to find them in the first place if there > is no index page? Should we all memorize the URLs? > > Joshua. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
