I take it then, that no one would be terribly upset if I added a canonical reference in the 2.0 branch to the 2.2 branch. I think pointing to 2.4 at this point would most likely just confuse both people and the search engines, since so much has changed since 2.0.
This first update (I'll get on that right away) will be for the sake of search engines (hopefully) displaying at least 2.2 as recommended reading instead of 2.0. I'm not so sure about adding the 'noindex' meta tag to it just yet, since that would most likely make it invisible to people even if they searched for 2.0 documentation. We need to come to a decision on whether to retire the 2.0 docs before we should make a move like that. And once we have that decision, we can do with 2.0 what we did with 1.3. With regards, Daniel. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
