On 07/14/2012 02:38 PM, Tim Bannister wrote: > On 13 Jul 2012, at 20:31, Daniel Gruno wrote: > >> I take it then, that no one would be terribly upset if I added a >> canonical reference in the 2.0 branch to the 2.2 branch. I think >> pointing to 2.4 at this point would most likely just confuse both people >> and the search engines, since so much has changed since 2.0. > > There might be a Link: relation type that means “superseded by”. 2.0 was > superseded by 2.2, 2.2 by 2.4, etc. > > I'll have a look. It costs little to add, and somebody or some bot might find > it useful. > Yes, that's exactly what the canonical link type does, and that's what I've implemented in the 2.0 docs.
I am happy to report that, thanks to those links, Google now lists the 2.2 documentation instead of 2.0 when searching for common issues or modules. With regards, Daniel. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
