On 13 Jul 2012, at 20:31, Daniel Gruno wrote: > I take it then, that no one would be terribly upset if I added a > canonical reference in the 2.0 branch to the 2.2 branch. I think > pointing to 2.4 at this point would most likely just confuse both people > and the search engines, since so much has changed since 2.0.
There might be a Link: relation type that means “superseded by”. 2.0 was superseded by 2.2, 2.2 by 2.4, etc. I'll have a look. It costs little to add, and somebody or some bot might find it useful. -- Tim Bannister – is...@jellybaby.net
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
