On 10/20/2016 03:36 PM, André Malo wrote: > * Rich Bowen wrote: > > >> * We have translations that are grossly out of date. We should drop >> them. It remains only to define what "tool old" means? If a translation >> hasn't been touched since 2.4.0, I would recommend dropping it. >> Discussion? > > Guilty... However, I think, it would be waste to throw them away. I'm > proposing a "do not transform (and remove html) until current" solution > instead. I can also take a look at the build system to make that happen. > > >> * It also occurs to me that we should make specific recommendations of >> which docs should be translated first. For example, I think that the >> "Getting Started" doc, and the "HowTo" docs, would be good places to >> start, while the module docs, being more about technical detail and >> having a less conversational style, would come later. > > Hmm. People have itches to scratch. If at all, it should be a very weak > recommendation.
Yes, absolutely. More like when people say "where is the best place to start" we can give that recommendation. But if someone wants to translate mod_imagemap docs, go ahead. > >> * All of this hinges on actually getting translators. It *seems* that >> this used to be easier, but lately we have really stunk at attracting >> new translators. I think that this might be because our review process >> is so rigorous, and it's hard to find reviewers. > > Maybe, maybe not. I think, the project itself lost traction in terms of > contributions (from non-developers). It's not that cool anymore (or the hot > shit, take your pick). > > nd > -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
