On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:36:51PM +0200, André Malo wrote: > * Rich Bowen wrote: > > * We have translations that are grossly out of date. We should drop > > them. It remains only to define what "tool old" means? If a translation > > hasn't been touched since 2.4.0, I would recommend dropping it. > > Discussion? > > Guilty... However, I think, it would be waste to throw them away. I'm > proposing a "do not transform (and remove html) until current" solution > instead. I can also take a look at the build system to make that happen. > Sounds like a much better solution. > > > * All of this hinges on actually getting translators. It *seems* that > > this used to be easier, but lately we have really stunk at attracting > > new translators. I think that this might be because our review process > > is so rigorous, and it's hard to find reviewers. > > Maybe, maybe not. I think, the project itself lost traction in terms of > contributions (from non-developers). It's not that cool anymore (or the hot > shit, take your pick). > I think you're right. httpd moves slower too.
vh Mads Toftum -- http://flickr.com/photos/q42/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
