* Luca Toscano wrote:
> 2016-10-23 12:55 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com>:
> > 2016-10-20 21:46 GMT+02:00 Mads Toftum <m...@toftum.dk>:
> >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:36:51PM +0200, André Malo wrote:
> >> > * Rich Bowen wrote:
> >> > > * We have translations that are grossly out of date. We should
> >> > > drop them. It remains only to define what "tool old" means? If a
> >>
> >> translation
> >>
> >> > > hasn't been touched since 2.4.0, I would recommend dropping it.
> >> > > Discussion?
> >> >
> >> > Guilty... However, I think, it would be waste to throw them away.
> >> > I'm proposing a "do not transform (and remove html) until current"
> >> > solution instead. I can also take a look at the build system to make
> >> > that happen.
> >>
> >> Sounds like a much better solution.
> >
> > I'd be +1 only if there is a clean way to mark these files as
> > "old/stale/out-of-sync", together with a clean statement/note somewhere
> > about what to do with them in the medium longer term (even in a page
> > like https://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/).
>
> Bump :)
>
> Can we move forward removing some old and outdated documentations from
> the docs?
Sure. Is there a consensus about how?
nd
--
"Umfassendes Werk (auch fuer Umsteiger vom Apache 1.3)"
-- aus einer Rezension
<http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
