Am 29.09.2018 um 09:03 schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
Do we need to change something?
==============================
[ ] this mail is too long, do whatever you want, I just want something
that works
[ ] no. I can leave with the current tool chain
[X] yes. Let clean some dust and update what is needed
What version of XSLT is best for us?
===================================
[ ] 1.0 - this is what I'm used to, keep things stable
[ ] 2.0
[ ] 3.0 - the later the better, and/or the new functionalities rock!
Not qualified to answer.
Should we change our XSLT engine?
================================
[ ] No, I love Xalan and it is ASF. Just move to UTF-8 everywhere.
[X] Yes and Saxon is a good candidate. The license of the Home Edition
is Mozilla Public License version 2.0.
[ ] Yes and ______ should be used instead
What is the oldest version of Java we should support?
====================================================
[ ] 1.2 - what we claim now
[ ] 1.3 - what is needed required by Xalan 1.7.1
[ ] 1.4
[ ] 5.0 - what is required by Saxon 9.6
[ ] 6 - what is required by Saxon 9.7 and 9.8
[ ] 7
[X] 8 - what is required by the latest Saxon 9.9
[ ] 9
[ ] 10
[ ] 11
Depending of the minimum Java requirement consensus, we could also
wonder if:
- we still need jakarta-oro Regex parser (ASF, but retired since
2010-09-01). Regex in Java are considered stable since a long time now
[ ] keep it
[X] Axe it
If possible.
- we need to upgrade Ant. (Latest is 1.10.5. Ant 1.9.*: JDK 1.5+,
Ant 1.8.*: JDK 1.4+, Ant 1.7.*: JDK 1.3+, Ant 1.6.*: JDK 1.2+)
[ ] keep 1.6.5, we don't need to change
[ ] 1.9.x, recent enough, still maintained, but not the latest.
Should be the more stable
[ ] 1.10.x, the later the better, and/or the new functionalities
rock!
1.9 or 1.10 would be OK for me.
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
