Digging around in docs-build via Mikes recent thread reminded me of all this.
Christophe, any interest/cycles to revisit? It might be nice to move up before this analysis ages too much. My thought to proceed after reviewing the thread: Should we collaborate on a new docs-build w/ java8 min, external ant, saxon, old jars removed, and minimal patch to style/ included? I think this keeps us out of anyones way just trying to build and check in xforms. On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 3:35 AM Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Il giorno mar 2 ott 2018 alle ore 15:55 Rainer Jung > <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> ha scritto: > > > > Am 29.09.2018 um 09:03 schrieb Christophe JAILLET: > > > Do we need to change something? > > > ============================== > > > [ ] this mail is too long, do whatever you want, I just want something > > > that works > > > [ ] no. I can leave with the current tool chain > > > [X] yes. Let clean some dust and update what is needed > > > > > What version of XSLT is best for us? > > > =================================== > > > > > > [ ] 1.0 - this is what I'm used to, keep things stable > > > [ ] 2.0 > > > [ ] 3.0 - the later the better, and/or the new functionalities rock! > > > > Not qualified to answer. > > > > > Should we change our XSLT engine? > > > ================================ > > > [ ] No, I love Xalan and it is ASF. Just move to UTF-8 everywhere. > > > [X] Yes and Saxon is a good candidate. The license of the Home Edition > > > is Mozilla Public License version 2.0. > > > [ ] Yes and ______ should be used instead > > > > > What is the oldest version of Java we should support? > > > ==================================================== > > > [ ] 1.2 - what we claim now > > > [ ] 1.3 - what is needed required by Xalan 1.7.1 > > > [ ] 1.4 > > > [ ] 5.0 - what is required by Saxon 9.6 > > > [ ] 6 - what is required by Saxon 9.7 and 9.8 > > > [ ] 7 > > > [X] 8 - what is required by the latest Saxon 9.9 > > > [ ] 9 > > > [ ] 10 > > > [ ] 11 > > > > > Depending of the minimum Java requirement consensus, we could also > > > wonder if: > > > - we still need jakarta-oro Regex parser (ASF, but retired since > > > 2010-09-01). Regex in Java are considered stable since a long time now > > > [ ] keep it > > > [X] Axe it > > > > If possible. > > > > > - we need to upgrade Ant. (Latest is 1.10.5. Ant 1.9.*: JDK 1.5+, > > > Ant 1.8.*: JDK 1.4+, Ant 1.7.*: JDK 1.3+, Ant 1.6.*: JDK 1.2+) > > > [ ] keep 1.6.5, we don't need to change > > > [ ] 1.9.x, recent enough, still maintained, but not the latest. > > > Should be the more stable > > > [ ] 1.10.x, the later the better, and/or the new functionalities > > > rock! > > > > 1.9 or 1.10 would be OK for me. > > > > Regards, > > > > Rainer > > > +1 to what Rainer said. > > Thanks a lot for this work!! > > Luca > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org > -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
