It would help a lot if the instructions on using our Alfresco setup were brought up to date. I'm a bit reluctant to move back until that is done.
David, what are the chances of your getting time to do this within the next week? Other than that, I'm happy to go with whatever the other active members decide. Jean On 25/02/2012, at 2:49, Tom Davies <tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Hi :) > My opinion doesn't really count as i don't do any of the editing. It would > be good to hear from the people doing the work. > > However, i think it would be good to return to the Alfresco method. It is a > bright, fresh interface that could help the translations teams. We do still > have wiki-pages describing how to use it. Some of it has been > "commented-out" temporarily but it's easy to reinstate. > > Moving back would mean that we have a fairly recent back-up on another site > so even if we stay at ODFAuthors i think it is a good idea to get all the > updated chapters back over to Alfresco just in case ODFAuthors goes down or > becomes inacessible. > > Regards from > Tom :) > > > --- On Fri, 24/2/12, David Nelson <li...@traduction.biz> wrote: > > From: David Nelson <li...@traduction.biz> > Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update > To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org > Date: Friday, 24 February, 2012, 12:22 > > Hi Tom, > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Tom Davies <tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> So, this is a good time to upgrade Alfresco if you want and check the >> upgrades are working with no more wrinkles. I think you are saying that you >> have already done that but i'm not certain. I can dig out the email address >> of the other chap that was keen to learn to help with Alfresco so that we >> can see if he is still keen. > > All the upgrading is complete. There is no further work to do in that > respect. Whether or not the team still wishes to use Alfresco is a > debate that I'll leave you guys to decide about. > > I can only point out that, when left in peace and not bullied, > Alfresco has been pretty stable and reliable. The only outages were > entirely due to human error: the last upgrade was incorrectly > executed. I certainly wouldn't see any need to upgrade the platform > any further until long into the future: all past issues are now > resolved (non-handling of accented characters in folder names: fixed; > intermittent failures with multiple-file uploads: *vastly* improved). > > -- > David Nelson > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted > > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
