On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 17:12 -0400, Gary Schnabl wrote:
> I haven't gotten around to recheck all the list paragraphs styles yet
> for v. 3.5.x--easy to do, using the factory-default parameters. However,
> the older OOo styles (v. 3.3.x) did not have consistent formatting for
> all the Ns, in addition to OOo's having buggy styles that could not
> properly be reformatted outside of a narrow indentation range for many Ns.
>
> IMO, all those list paragraph styles need to be reformatted, according
> to the intended purposes for them by users or template designers, anyway.
>
>
> Gary
IMO, the list paragraph styles need to be studied very carefully. I
find duplication of styles that unnecessarily makes understanding them
very complex.
For example among the factory-default styles, the Indents & Spacing
parameters of Numbering 1 and Numbering 1 Cont. are identical. Why
should the next style for Numbering 1 Start be Numbering 1? Why is it
not Numbering 1 Cont.? Why does Numbering 1 Start have a 2 line space
above it, and Numbering 1 End have a two line space below it?
In our chapter template we have a similar situation: OOoNum 123
Start and OOoNum 123 Cont. have identical parameters in the Indents &
Spacing tab. Why is this?
--Dan
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
