Hello Regina (again you say;-)))

Your explanation has helped tremendously. I shall now create two separate 
sections for Chap 7 Working with 3D Objects.

With regards

Peter Schofield
[email protected]



On 13 Oct 2013, at 16:10, Regina Henschel [via Document Foundation Mail 
Archive] <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Peter, 
> 
> PeeWee schrieb: 
> > Hello Regina 
> > 
> > My German is very limited - no problem in German bars and restaurants 
> > and paying there bill. I did spend two years in Hamburg and learnt 
> > some German from the people I became friends with. However that was a 
> > long time ago. 
> 
> I still struggling with English. My written English is often strange and 
> it is difficult for me to understand spoken English. 
> 
> > 
> > You have made 3D objects a little clearer with your explanation. What 
> > puzzles me is why is there such a complication with 3D objects? 
> 
> Let's go back in history. In StarOffice and in the sequel in OOo1 only 
> some kind of shapes exists. The status bar shows in the left field, 
> which kind of object it is. For example, you will see "Rectangle 
> selected" or "Callout selected" or "Parallelogram selected" or "Bézier 
> curve selected" ... 
> This draw objects can be turned to 3D objects. The methods are rotation 
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_of_revolution) and extrusion 
> (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extrusion_%28Geometrie%29; I find no 
> English one). 
> There exists a 3D engine with a lot of features, but the UI is confusing 
> and bad designed, not changed since StarOffice times. The UI is in great 
> want of refresh and redesign. 
> 
> These classical draw objects were not able to store the features of the 
> "Autoforms" of Microsoft Office. Therefore a new kind of shapes were 
> implemented in OOo2, the so called custom shapes. They got the ability 
> to contain informations, how they should be rendered as 
> 3D-extrusion-object. And they got a new UI for setting this properties. 
> For all the different custom shapes you get only the one string "shape 
> selected" in the status bar. At the same time the "Fontwork gallery" was 
> introduced. From a technical view, that are custom shapes as well. 
> 
>   Once 
> > a 2D object is extruded into 3D then you should be able to use all 
> > the tools that are available for the ready made 3D objects. 
> 
> The ready made 3D objects are not only simple 3D objects, but they are 
> 3D scenes. You cannot have such 3D object without a root 3D scene. Such 
> 3D scene cannot include custom shapes. There is no way to write such 
> thing into the file format. And there exists no requests to change the 
> spec in this direction. If you convert a custom shape by the tools "To 
> 3D" or "To 3D rotation object" they are converted to a polygon or to a 
> curve first, but the user is not notified about that. Therefore the 3D 
> dialog is not suitable for custom shapes. 
> 
> To get a deeper understanding of this very different kind of objects, it 
> might be worth reading the spec, section 10.5 "3D Shapes" and 10.6 
> "Custom Shape". 
> [http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/os/OpenDocument-v1.2-os-part1.html] 
> 
>   This 
> > complication makes it a difficult thing to get across simple enough 
> > for a novice user to understand, so your help will be appreciated. 
> 
> I agree, that is a challenge. In contrast to the old German version, I 
> now would make two strictly independent sections, one for "3D Shapes" 
> and a new section covering all the properties and handlings of "Custom 
> Shapes". There exists not only their special way of extruding, but also 
> the yellow handles to vary the shapes, and they differ in the way text 
> is used. You can even write your own custom shapes, but sadly their is 
> no UI for that, but you have to write into the file directly. I had a 
> talk about it last FOSDEM. 
> 
> The current drawing toolbar in LO makes it more complicate. OOo had the 
> classical rectangle and ellipse in the toolbar, and you could turn them 
> into 3D shapes. But the current drawing toolbar has dropped them, and 
> instead has included the custom shapes "Rectangle" and "Ellipse" which 
> are already in the drop-down list "Basic shapes" of the custom shapes. 
> To use the classical shapes, you have to customize the toolbar first. 
> The consequence of which is, that users do not get the properties they 
> are used to, rounded corners for example. 
> 
> If you have questions about the shapes, please ask. I do not have time 
> enough to write a full text, but will comment on single problems. 
> 
> Kind regards 
> Regina 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe e-mail to: [hidden email] 
> Problems? 
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
> deleted 
> 
> 
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion 
> below:
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Version-4-1-Draw-Guide-tp4068532p4077877.html
> To start a new topic under Documentation, email 
> [email protected] 
> To unsubscribe from Documentation, click here.
> NAML





-----
Peter Schofield
[email protected]
--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Version-4-1-Draw-Guide-tp4068532p4077957.html
Sent from the Documentation mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to