I know exactly what you mean. Though i guess we are talking about technology form early last century ☺
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jarek Steliga Sent: Monday, 14 October 2019 3:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DOG mailing list] ignition advancement not affected by the RPMs Ric, Ian, Thank you very much. The idea of there being no advance seems bizarre for someone having only to do with 'terrestrial' engines :-) On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 08:07, Ric Sutton <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi jarek Yep you are correct, there is no advance. It stays the same throughout the rev range. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Jarek Steliga Sent: Sunday, 13 October 2019 5:17 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [DOG mailing list] ignition advancement not affected by the RPMs Hello, Can someone please confirm that once my L2000 starts with a 43 series Slick magneto mounted, the ignition advancement will stay the same (30%) throughout the whole RPMs range? In other words as I understand in this system there is no spark advance mechanism installed apart from the impulse coupling which only affects (delays/retards) the spark timing up until 400 RPMs (i.e. well before the engine kicks in). Thank you in anticipation Jarek
