According to http://developer.kde.org/~wheeler/cpp-pitfalls.html:
Note: While it is not required to use the virtual keyword in our subclass implementations (since if the base class implementation is virtual all subclass implementations will be virtual) it is still good style to do so. I don't think DOLFIN does this. Should we put adding the virtual keyword to virtual methods on the todo-list? After all, the virtual keyword adds information to the user. Ola _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
