On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:32:58PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > Ola Skavhaug wrote: > > According to http://developer.kde.org/~wheeler/cpp-pitfalls.html: > > > > Note: While it is not required to use the virtual keyword in our subclass > > implementations (since if the base class implementation is virtual all > > subclass implementations will be virtual) it is still good style to do so. > > > > I don't think DOLFIN does this. > > No, it doesn't. > > Should we put adding the virtual keyword to > > virtual methods on the todo-list? After all, the virtual keyword adds > > information to the user.
Sounds good to me. -- Anders _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
