Ola Skavhaug wrote: > According to http://developer.kde.org/~wheeler/cpp-pitfalls.html: > > Note: While it is not required to use the virtual keyword in our subclass > implementations (since if the base class implementation is virtual all > subclass implementations will be virtual) it is still good style to do so. > > I don't think DOLFIN does this.
No, it doesn't. Should we put adding the virtual keyword to > virtual methods on the todo-list? After all, the virtual keyword adds > information to the user. > I'm indifferent. Garth > Ola > _______________________________________________ > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
